Dineen BP, Bourne RRA, Ali SM, Noourl Haq
DM, Johnson GJ, Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:820-8
According to the World Health Organization
worldwide there are an estimated 45 million people
that are blind with an additional 135 million individuals
visually impaired. Globally it is known that cataract
is the leading caused of blindness, with some 16-20
million people suffering from blinding cataract2,3.
In country specific terms, India is the country with
the highest number of blind people (over 9 million)
with the most prevalent cause of blindness and low
vision being unoperated cataract, as indicated by
several population based studies over the past two
decades.
In the neighboring
region, blindness prevalence surveys have been conducted
in Nepal nationally and in one region of Pakistan
that yielded all age blindness prevalence rates of
0.8% and 1.0% respectively. A subsequent survey in
two administrative regions of Nepal identified a blindness
prevalence of 3.0% in people 45 years and older.
Before this present
study, no nationwide study had been conducted in Bangladesh-a
country of over 130 million inhabitants-concerning
the extent of blindness or the main causes of vision
impairment. This lack of vital information is particularly
serious, given the strategies identified in the WHO
Global Initiative for the Elimination of Avoidable
blindness by 2020 (Vision 2020). The absence of reliable
population based epidemiological data on blindness
and low vision in Banglandesh is a serious impediment
to the effective national planning of eye care programmes.
In order to redress
the lack of blindness and low vision data among adults
for this populous country, a nationwide survey was
designed. The purpose of this study was to estimate
the age and sex specific prevalence rates of blindness
and visual impairment in adults 30 years of age and
older in Banglandesh and to identify the cause specific
prevalence in the sample.
A nationally representative
sample of 12782 adults 30 years of age and older was
selected based on multistage, cluster random sampling
with probability proportional to size procedures.
The breakdown of the cluster sites was proportional
to the rural/urban distribution of the national population.
The examination protocol consisted of an interview,
visual acuity (VA) testing, auto refraction, and optic
disc examination on all subjects. Corrected VA retesting,
cataract grading, and a dilated fundal examination
were performed on all visual impaired subjects. The
definitions of blindness (<3/60) and low vision
(<6/12 to > 3/60) were based on the presenting
visual acuity in the better eye. The world Health
Organization/Prevention of Blindness proforma and
its classification system for identifying the main
cause of low vision and blindness for each examined
subject was used.
In total, 11 624
eligible subjects were examined (90.9% response rate)
across the 154 cluster sites. A total of 162 people
were bilaterally blind (1.53% age standardized prevalence)
while a further 1608 subjects (13.8%) had low vision
(<6/12 VA) binocularly. Visual acuity was >
6/12 in the “better eye” in the remaining 9854 subjects
(84.8%); however, 748 of these people had low vision
in the fellow eye. The main causes of low vision were
cataract (74.2%), refractive error (18.7%), and macular
degeneration (1.9%). Cataract was the predominant
cause (79.6%) of bilateral blindness followed by uncorrected
aphakia (6.2%) and macular degeneration (3.1%).
The
authors concluded with the remarks that there are
an estimated 650000 blind adults (95% CI 552 175 to
740 736) aged 30 and over in Banglandesh, the large
majority of whom are suffering from operable cataract.
This survey indicates the need for the development
and implementation of a national plan for the delivery
of effective eye care services, aimed principally
at resolving the large cataract backlog and the inordinate
burden of refractive error.
Incidence
of visual loss in Rural
southwest Uganda
Mbulaiteye SM, Reeves
BC, Mulwanyi F Whitworth JAG, Johnson G
Br J Ophthalmol
2003;87:829-33.
Blindness and visual impairment contribute
to significant avoidable handicap in Africa, mainly
because of cataract, refractive errors, nutrition,
and various infections and trachoma. Several studies
have described the prevalence of blindness or visual
impairment (referred to as visual loss in this paper)
in sub-Saharan Africa. A recent review identified
22 surveys conducted between 1980 and 2000, but none
provided incidence data. These studies have focused
mainly on nutritional and infective causes of visual
loss in countries where these conditions are common.
As the proportion of visual impairment attributable
to these conditions falls, the relative importance
of other causes will increase. No studies have looked
at the incidence of visual loss in Africa in settings
in which infectious conditions are not the dominant
cause of visual impairment, partly because of the
large expense and the need for specialized staff that
is usually required.
Recently, “Vision
2020” was initiated as a worldwide programme to reduce
the number of blind people from 75 million to 25 million
by 2020. The initiative calls for staff, infrastructure,
and capacity development by governments and non-governmental
organization involved in eye care and to improve coordinated
and targeted delivery of diagnostic, therapeutic,
and surveillance technologies to populations in need
of services. However, the lack of data on incidence
of visual loss in parts of Africa limits forecasting
of the needs and the service provision relevant to
particular populations. We recently reported
the use of an E-optotype chart as a simple cheap tool
with high sensitivity and specificity for identifying
visual loss in a rural population in southwest Uganda.12
We now report the incidence and causes of visual loss
in this population, using the E-optotype chart, followed
between 1994 and 1998.
The purpose of this
study was to conduct a survey measure prevalence of
eye disease in Africa, but not of incidence, which
is needed to forecast trends. The incidence of visual
loss is reported in southwest Uganda.
A rural population
residing in 15 neighboring villages was followed
between 1994-5 (R1) and 1997-8 (R2). Survey staff
screened adult residents (13 years or older) for
visual acuity using laminated Snellen’s E optotype
cards at each survey. Those who failed (VA >
6/18) were evaluated by an ophthalmic clinical officer
and an ophthalmologist. Incidence of visual loss
(per 1000 person years (PY) was calculated among
those who had normal vision at R1.
2124 people were studied
at both survey rounds (60.9% of those screened at
R1); 48% were male. Participants in R1 were older
(34.7 versus 31.5 years at R2, p< 0.001). Visual
loss in R2 occurred in 56 (2.8%) of 1997, yielding
a crude incidence rate of 9.9, and an age standardized
incidence rate of 13.2, per 1000 PY. Incidence of
visual loss increased with age from 1.21 per 1000
PY among people aged 13-34 to 64.2 per 1000 PY in
those aged 65 years or older (p for trend > 0.001).
The six commonest causes of visual loss were: cataract,
refractive error, macular degeneration, chorioretinitis,
glaucoma, and corneal opacity. If similar rates are
assumed for the whole of Uganda,
it is estimated that 30 348 people would develop bilateral
blindness or bilateral visual impairment, per year.
The authors concluded with remarks that cataract
and refractive error were the major causes of incident
visual loss in south west Uganda and suggested that
these data are valuable for forecasting and planning
eye services.
Bacterial keratitis: predisposing factors, clinical and microbiological review of 300 cases
Bourcier T, Thomas
F, Borderie V. Chaumeil C, Laroche
L. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:834-8
Bacterial keratitis is a serious ocular infectious
disease that can lead to servere visual disability.
The severity of the corneal infection usually depends
on the underlying condition of the cornea and the
pathogenicity of the infecting bacteria. Many patients
have a poor clinical outcome if aggressive and appropriate
therapy is not promptly initiated.
Bacterial keratitis
is rare in the absence of predisposing factors. Until
recently, most cases of bacterial keratitis were associated
with ocular trauma or ocular surface diseases. However,
the widespread use of contact lenses has dramatically
increased the incidence of contact lens related keratitis.
The spectrum of bacterial keratitis can also be influenced
by geographic and climatic factors. Many differences
in keratitis profile have been noted between populations
living in rural or in city areas, in western, or in
developing countries.
In recent years the literature extensively addressed this
issue but only a few publications reviewed large series
of patients with bacterial keratitis. Very little
information is available on the frequency of factors
predisposing to bacterial keratitis and on the demographic
characteristics of those patients.
The purpose of this study was to identify predisposing
factors and to define clinical and microbiological
characteristics of bacterial keratitis in current
practice.
A retrospective analysis of the hospital records of patients
presenting with bacterial keratitis and treated at
the Quinze-Vingts National Center of Ophthalmology,
Paris, France, was performed during a 20 month period.
A bacterial keratitis was defined as a suppurative
corneal infiltrate and overlying epithelial defect
associated with presence of bacteria on corneal scraping
and/or that was cured with antibiotic therapy. Risk
factors, clinical and microbiological data were collected.
300 cases (291 patients) of presumed bacterial kertitis
were included. Potential predisposing factors, usually
multiple, were identified in 90.6% of cases. Contact
lens wear was the main risk factor (50.3%). Trauma
or a history of keratopathy was found in 15% and 21%
of cases, respectively. An organism was identified
in 201 eyes (68%). 83% of the infections involved
Gram positive bacteria, 17% involved Gram negative
bacteria, and 2% were polymicrobial. Gram negative
bacteria were associated with severe anterior chamber
inflammation (p=0.004), as well as greater surface
of infiltrates (p=0.01). 99% of ulcers resolved with
treatment, but only 60% of patients had visual acuity
better than the level at admission, and 5% had very
poor visual outcome.
The authors concluded that contact lens wear is the most
important risk factor. Most community acquired bacterial
ulcers resolve with appropriate treatment.
Is
manual small incision cataract surgery affordable
in the developing countries? A
cost comparison with extracapsular
cataract
extraction
Gogate PM, Deshpande
M, Wormald RP. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:843-6
A huge backlog of
cataract blindness exists in the developing world.
It is estimated that 3.8 million people develop
blinding cataract every year in India, as against
2.7 million cataract surgeries done every year.
Any type of cataract surgery, which hopes to tackle
this backlog, has to be affordable to the service
providers and ultimately the service recipients.
Cataract extraction is one of the most cost effective
of all surgical interventions in terms of quality
of life restored. Cataract surgery accounts for
the majority of the workload of ophthalmic units
worldwide. Researchers estimate that cataract annually
causes a loss of US$4.4 billion to India, the cumulative
loss for the entire lifespan being US$22.2 billion.
On the other hand the cost of tackling cataract
blindness is US$0.15 billion.
Phacoemulsification
is considered the standard of care for cataract surgery
in the developed world. Cost, in terms of equipment
and training, has limited its use in the developing
world. High quality, high volume cataract surgery
has been popularized in community eye care centers
to effectively manage the large backlog of cataract
blindness. This is mostly extracapsular cataract extraction
with intraocular lens implantation. Manual small incision
surgery through a scleral tunnel that does not need
to be sutured may be a more appropriate technology
for such settings. It needs similar equipment and
facilities like the conventional ECCE that are readily
available
in most centers.
The
purpose of this study was to compare the cost of manual
small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) with conventional
extracapsular cataract surgery (ECCE) in community
eye care settings.
A
single masked randomized trial was used to compare
the safety, efficacy, time, and patient satisfaction
of surgery by both the techniques. The fixed facility
and recurrent cost for the two procedures was calculated
based on information collected form different sources.
Average cost per procedure was calculated by dividing
the total cost by the number of procedures performed.
The
average cost of an ECCE procedure for the hospital
was Rs 727.76 (US$15.82) and the average cost of a
MSICS procedure was Rs 721.40 ($ 15.68), of which
Rs 521.51 ($11.34) was the fixed facility cost common
to both.
The authors reached
the conclusion that both ECCE and MSICS are economical
in community eye care settings, but MSICS is economical
and given better uncorrected visual acuity in a greater
proportion of patients.
A 10 year retrospective survey
of cataract Surgery and endophthalmitis in a
Single Eye Unit: injectable lenses lower
The incidence of endophthalmitis
Mayer E, Cadman
D, Ewings P, Twomey JM. Gray
RH, Claridge KG, Hakin KN, Bates AK
Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:867-9
Cataract surgery is
one of the most commonly performed and successful
surgical procedures in the world. Over the past 10
years in the United Kingdom, there has been a progressive
change from extracapsular extraction (ECCE) to phacoemulsification
(phaco). Concurrent with this change has been the
development of foldable and injectable intraocular
lenses (IOLs), obviating the need for incision enlargement.
Complications
after cataract surgery occur with similar frequency
for both phaco and ECCE. Endophthalmitis can be one
of the most devastating of these, since it can lead
to complete blindness in the affected eye; unchecked
it can even give rise to cavernous sinus thrombosis
and death. Fortunately it is rare, with a reported
frequency in the UK National Cataract Surgery Survey
of between 0.1 and 0.2%, a figure comparable with
other reports.
Most
cases of postoperative endophthalmitis occur acutely,
with a speed and severity that reflect bacterial load
and virulence. Virulent organisms present early, usually
with hypopyon and severe inflammation. Less virulent
organisms cause milder and later onset disease, which
may respond to topical steroids, and are difficult
to distinguish from persistent postoperative inflammation.
The
purpose of this study was to study the incidence of
endophthalmitis following cataract surgery over a
10 year period, and to examine ways in which this
may be related to changes in surgical technique.
All
cases of endophthalmitis occurring over a 10 year
period within a single ophthalmic unit in the United
Kingdom were reviewed, and possible risk factors identified.
During the study period,
as the technique of extracapsular cataract surgery
was replaced by phacoemulsification, there was a commensurate
reduction in the incidence of endophthalmitis. Injectable
IOLs were associated with the lowest risk of postoperative
endophthalmitis (0.028%). The authors observed
and concluded with remarks that injectable intraocular
lenses do not make contact with the ocular surface
and this may result in the observed lower rate of
endophthalmitis. This, and the ease with which they
can be inserted through small incisions, support their
use as the first line method of lens insertion.
Retinal thickness decreases with age: An OCT study
Alamouti B, Funk
J. Br. J Ophthalmol
2003;87:899-901.
Confocal laser scanning tomography
(Heidelberg retina tomograph, HRT) is a useful tool
to monitor the progression of optic disc cupping in
glaucoma or ocular hypertension. When optic disc parameters
are calculated by the HRT, a reference plane is used.
The height of this reference plane depends on the
retinal thickness at the temporal disc margin. It
was assumed that the retinal thickness and the RNFL
(retinal nerve fibre layer) thickness at this particular
position do no decrease with age.
The purpose of the
present study was to verify whether the latter hypothesis
is right or wrong using optical coherence tomography
(OCT: OCT 2000, Humphrey Instruments, San Leandro,
CA, USA). In addition authors wanted to determine
the reproducibility of OCT measurements at the temporal
disc margin.
In three dimensional
optic disc tomography a reference plane is required
to calculate optic disc rim or cup values. The position
of the reference plane often depends on the retinal
thickness at the temporal disc margin. Originally
it was assumed that the retinal thickness at the temporal
disc margin is independent of age.
100 eyes of 100 healthy
volunteers were included in this study. Three OCT
scans were performed on each eye. The scans were aligned
vertically and placed at the temporal edge of the
optic disc. For each eye, the thickness of the whole
retina as well as the thickness of the retinal nerve
fibre layer were calculated together with their coefficients
of variation. Thereafter retinal thickness and nerve
fibre layer thickness were correlated with age.
The mean retinal thickness
was 249 (SD 22) μm. The mean nerve fibre layer
thickness was 109 (22) μm. The mean coefficients
of variation were 3.5% (total retinal thickness) and
8.0% (nerve fibre layer thickness). Both the total
retinal thickness and the nerve fibre layer thickness
were significantly correlated with age (total retina:
y=269.5 – 0.53 x x; R2=0.133; p = 0.0002,
nerve fibre layer: y = 126.8 – 0.44 x x; R2
= 0.094; p <0.0019.
The authors concluded
that using OCT scans the total retinal thickness can
be calculated with high reproducibility (coefficient
of variation = 3.5%). The reproducibility of nerve
fibre layer thickness measurements is clearly lower
(coefficient of variation = 8.0%). Both the total
retinal thickness and the nerve fibre layer thickness
significantly decrease with age. This influence of
the age related decrease in RNFL/retinal thickness
on the reference plane, however, is negligible.
Detecting
chloroquine retinopathy: Electro-oculogram
versus colour vision
Neubauer AS, Samari-Kermani
K, Schaller U. Welge-Lϋβen U, Rudolph G.
Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:902-8
Ocular toxicity caused by antimalarials was
first described in the literature as early as 1957.
As antimalarials were found effective not only for
treatment and prophylaxis of malaria but also for
many rheumatoid diseases they are used ever more frequently
nowadays and are given as a long
term medication. The risk of ocular toxicity is given
as a along term medication. The risk of ocular toxicity
is therefore considerable. The incidence of early retinopathy in ophthalmologically
unmonitored patients was estimated as 10% for chloroquine
and 3-4% for hydroxychloroquine. Advanced retinopathy
had an incidence of 0.5%. These risks might be reduced
substantially be regular observation and testing.
Some degree of corneal
deposits (verticillata) can be demonstrated in most
patients taking chloroquine, but these changes very
rarely impair vision. Corneal deposits occur more
frequently with chloroquine than with hydroxychloroquine,
are located in the epithelium and subepithelial stroma
and are mostly reversible. By contrast, retinopathy
is severe ocular side effect presenting with bilateral,
reproducible, and permanent visual field abnormalities.
Early retinal changes consist of a pigmentary stippling
or granular appearance of the macula, with the patient
still being asymptomatic. Advanced retinopathy may
show the typical “bull’s eye’ maculopathy associated
with impaired visual acuity and central visual field
defects. These changes of advanced maculopathy are
irreversible and may progress even after cessation
of the drug.
To purpose of this
study was to investigate the relative sensitivity
and specificity of two tests of retinal function (the
electro-oculogram (EOG) and a computerized colour
vision test) in screening for ocular toxicity caused
by chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine.
93 patients with rheumatic
diseases receiving long term chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine
therapy were followed for an average of 2.6 years.
Clinical examination, an EOG, and a quantitative test
of colour vision were carried out every 6 months.
Mild fundus changes
were observed in 38 patients. Four patients developed
typical bull’s eye maculopathy, three of whom had
received 250,365, and 550 g total dose of chloroquine,
and one 1500 g
of hydroxychloroquine. Statistical analysis of all
patients showed that for those with no fundus changes
or stippled pigmentation a number showed elevation
of tritan threshold, so that if macular stippling
is a sign of mild retinopathy the test on tritan changes
has a 64% sensitivity and 63% specificity for an upper
threshold value of 7%. All four patients with bull’s
eye lesions showed a marked disturbance of tritan
colour vision, with a threshold of 14.8%, a sensitivity
of 75%, and a specificity of 94%. For protan colour
vision a threshold of 10% gives 75% sensitivity and
91% specificity. By contrast, neither an absolute
nor a relative EOG reduction was a valid criterion
for early or late chloroquine retinopathy. In advanced
retinopathy an Arden coefficient (AQ) < 180% yields
50% sensitivity and 54% specificity. When AQ <
(160% is the threshold, sensitivity does not increase
but specificity rises to 82%. Occurrence of marked
corneal deposits on clinical examination yields 50%
sensitivity and 90% specificity in this situation.
The authors concluded
that screening for chloroquine retinopathy can be
improved by using a sensitive colour test. Disturbance
of the tritan axis appears to occur first. A normal
test result on computerized colour testing virtually
excludes any retinopathy by antimalarials. The EOG
is of little diagnostic value.